1Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. 3rd edition. Pearson Education Limited; 2016.
2Géron A. Hands-on machine learnng with scikit-learn, Keras, and tensorflow: concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. 2nd edition. Incorperated, editor. O’Reilly Media, USA; 2019.
3Li J, Yang G, Zhang L. Artificial Intelligence Empowered Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in Cardiology: A State-of-the-Art Review. Phenomics 2023;3:586-596.
4Visvikis D, Cheze Le Rest C, Jaouen V, Hatt M. Artificial intelligence, machine (deep) learning and radio(geno)mics: definitions and nuclear medicine imaging applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:2630-2637.
5Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G, et al. Introduction to Radiomics. J Nucl Med 2020;61:488-495.
6Ramon AJ, Yang Y, Pretorius PH, et al. Initial investigation of low-dose SPECT-MPI via deep learning. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp 2018;1-3.
7Song C, Yang Y, Wernick MN, et al. Low-dose cardiac-gated spect studies using a residual convolutional neural network. IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2019;1:653-656.
8Wang B, Liu H. FBP-Net for direct reconstruction of dynamic PET images. Phys Med Biol 2020;6.
9Hu Z, Xue H, Zhang Q, et al. DPIR-Net: Direct PET image reconstruction based on the Wasserstein generative adversarial network. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 2020.
10Lee JS. A review of deep learning-based approaches for attenuation correction in positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 2021;5.
11Li T, Zhang M, Qi W, Asma E, Qi J. Motion correction of respiratory-gated PET images using deep learning based image registration framework. Phys Med Biol 2020;65:155003.
12Shi L, Lu Y, Dvornek N, et al. Automatic Inter-Frame Patient Motion Correction for Dynamic Cardiac PET Using Deep Learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2021;40:3293-3304.
13Hagio T, Poitrasson-Rivière A, Moody JB, et al. “Virtual” attenuation correction: improving stress myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging using deep learning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022;49:3140-3149.
14Yang J, Shi L, Wang R, et al. Direct Attenuation Correction Using Deep Learning for Cardiac SPECT: A Feasibility Study. J Nucl Med 2021;62:1645-1652.
15Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R, Bradshaw T, McMillan AB. Deep Learning MR Imaging-based Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Imaging. Radiology 2018;286:676-684.
16Tao Q, Yan W, Wang Y, et al. Deep Learning-based Method for Fully Automatic Quantification of Left Ventricle Function from Cine MR Images: A Multivendor, Multicenter Study. Radiology 2019;290:81-88.
17Guo Z, Li X, Huang H, Guo N, Li Q. Deep Learning-based Image Segmentation on Multimodal Medical Imaging. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 2019;3:162-169.
18Zeleznik R, Foldyna B, Eslami P, et al. Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography. Nat Commun 2021;12:715.
19Kwiecinski J, Tzolos E, Meah MN, et al. Machine Learning with 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET and Quantitative Plaque Analysis on CT Angiography for the Future Risk of Myocardial Infarction. J Nucl Med 2022;63:158-165.
20Betancur J, Hu LH, Commandeur F, et al. Deep Learning Analysis of Upright-Supine High-Efficiency SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Prediction of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Study. J Nucl Med 2019;60:664-670.
21Eisenberg E, Miller RJH, Hu LH, et al. Diagnostic safety of a machine learning-based automatic patient selection algorithm for stress-only myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2022;29:2295-2307.
22Otaki Y, Singh A, Kavanagh P, et al. Clinical Deployment of Explainable Artificial Intelligence of SPECT for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15:1091-1102.
23Hu LH, Miller RJH, Sharir T, et al. Prognostically safe stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging guided by machine learning: report from REFINE SPECT. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;22:705-714.
24Juarez-Orozco LE, Martinez-Manzanera O, van der Zant FM, Knol RJJ, Knuuti J. Deep Learning in Quantitative PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Study on Cardiovascular Event Prediction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:180-182.
25Rios R, Miller RJH, Hu LH, et al. Determining a minimum set of variables for machine learning cardiovascular event prediction: results from REFINE SPECT registry. Cardiovasc Res 2022;118:2152-2164.
26Kolossváry M, Kellermayer M, Merkely B, Maurovich-Horvat P. Cardiac Computed Tomography Radiomics: A Comprehensive Review on Radiomic Techniques. J Thorac Imaging 2018;33:26-34.
27Motwani M. Hiding beyond plain sight: Textural analysis of positron emission tomography to identify high-risk plaques in carotid atherosclerosis. J Nucl Cardiol 2021;28:1872-1874.
28Tawakol A, Migrino RQ, Bashian GG, et al. In vivo 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging provides a noninvasive measure of carotid plaque inflammation in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1818-1824.
29Otaki Y, Miller RJH, Slomka PJ. The application of artificial intelligence in nuclear cardiology. Ann Nucl Med 2022;36:111-122.
30Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, et al. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:1516-1521.