1Taïeb D, Hicks RJ, Hindié E, et al. European Association of Nuclear Medicine Practice Guideline/Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Procedure Standard 2019 for radionuclide imaging of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:2112-2137.
2Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:1915-1942.
3Timmers HJ, Taieb D, Pacak K. Current and future anatomical and functional imaging approaches to pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Horm Metab Res 2012;44:367-372.
4de Wailly P, Oragano L, Radé F, et al. Malignant pheochromocytoma: new malignancy criteria. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:239-246.
5Timmers HJLM. Radionuclide Imaging of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma in the Era of Multi-omics. Contemporary Endocrinology 2017.
6Oral A, Akgün A. I-123/I-131 Metaiodobenzylguanidine in Theranostics. Nuclear Medicine Seminars. Galenos Yayinevi 2015;1:92-102.
7Kara Gedik G, Aksoy T, Aydın F, et al. TSNM, Procedure Guideline for Radioiodinated MIBG Scintigraphy in Children 2.0. Nuclear Medicine Seminars. Galenos Yayinevi; 2015;1:50-56.
8Jacobson AF, Deng H, Lombard J, Lessig HJ, Black RR. 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy for the detection of neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma: results of a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:2596-2606.
9van der Harst E, de Herder WW, Bruining HA, et al. [123 I]Metaiodobenzylguanidine and [ 111 In]Octreotide Uptake in Benign and Malignant Pheochromocytomas* [Internet]. Pathology (R.R.d.K.). 2001. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/86/2/685/2841043.
10Lumachi F, Tregnaghi A, Zucchetta P, et al. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of CT, MRI and 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy in localizing pheochromocytomas: A prospective study [Internet]. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 2006. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/nuclearmedicinecomm.
11Treglia G, Pascale M, Lazzeri E, van der Bruggen W, Delgado Bolton RC, Glaudemans AWJM. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with spinal infection: a systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020;47:1287-1301.
12Han S, Suh CH, Woo S, Kim YJ, Lee JJ. Performance of 68Ga-DOTA-Conjugated Somatostatin Receptor-Targeting Peptide PET in Detection of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J Nucl Med 2019;60:369-376.
13Taïeb D, Tessonnier L, Sebag F, et al. The role of 18F-FDOPA and 18F-FDG-PET in the management of malignant and multifocal phaeochromocytomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;69:580-586.
14Hofman MS, Lau WF, Hicks RJ. Somatostatin receptor imaging with 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT: clinical utility, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls in interpretation. Radiographics 2015;35:500-516.
15Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, Jha A, Ling A, Lin FI, Pryma DA, Pacak K. Imaging of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. J Nucl Med 2021;62:1033-1042.
16Gonias S, Goldsby R, Matthay KK, et al. Phase II study of high-dose [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4162-4168.
17Quach A, Ji L, Mishra V, et al. Thyroid and hepatic function after high-dose 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131 I-MIBG) therapy for neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;56:191-201.
18Satapathy S, Mittal BR, Bhansali A. ‘Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in the management of advanced pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis’. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2019;91:718-727
19Demirci E, Kabasakal L, Toklu T, et al. 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours including high-grade (WHO G3) neuroendocrine tumours: response to treatment and long-term survival update. Nucl Med Commun 2018;39:789-796.
20Zaknun JJ, Bodei L, Mueller-Brand J, et al. The joint IAEA, EANM, and SNMMI practical guidance on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) in neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol İmaging 2013;40:800-816.