The Role of PET/CT in the Evaluation of Tumour Response to Immunotherapy
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Review
P: 196-211
July 2021

The Role of PET/CT in the Evaluation of Tumour Response to Immunotherapy

Nucl Med Semin 2021;7(2):196-211
1. Memorial Bahçelievler Hastanesi, Nükleer Tıp Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye
2. Memorial-Medstar Antalya Hastanesi, Nükleer Tıp Kliniği, Antalya, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Publish Date: 15.09.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy, which has been increasingly used in cancer treatment in recent years, has led to groundbreaking developments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, new monoclonal antibodies for immunotherapy, have totally changed clinical approaches and revealed very unique patterns in medical imaging. The importance of positron emission tomography/ computerized tomography (PET/CT), which allows the metabolic and morphological evaluation of the whole body, has increased for the early and accurate evaluation of both the immunological response and side effects. The use of existing response criteria may be misleading due to immune-related inflammation, and new approaches of assessing are needed. In this review, the role of PET/CT in evaluating immunotherapy response and potential solutions to emerging problems are discussed.

References

1Adams JL, Smothers J, Srinivasan R, Hoos A. Big opportunities for small molecules in immuno-oncology. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2015;14:603-622.        
2Couzin-Frankel J. Breakthrough of the year 2013. Cancer immunotherapy. Science 2013;342:1432-1433. 
3Li B, Chan HL, Chen P. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Basics and Challenges. Curr Med Chem 2019;26:3009-3025. 
4Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science 2018;359:1350-1355.
5Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Polak P, et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 2013;499:214-218. 
6Sharpe AH, Pauken KE. The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nat Rev Immunol 2018;18:153-167. 
7Goleva E, Lyubchenko T, Kraehenbuehl L, Lacouture ME, Leung DYM, Kern JA. Our current understanding of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cancer immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021;126:630-638. 
8Unterrainer M, Ruzicka M, Fabritius MP, et al. PET/CT imaging for tumour response assessment to immunotherapy: current status and future directions. Eur Radiol Exp 2020;4:63. 
9Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science 2015;348:56-61.
10Pons-Tostivint E, Latouche A, Vaflard P, et al. Comparative Analysis of Durable Responses on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Other Systemic Therapies: A Pooled Analysis of Phase III Trials. JCO Precis Oncol 2019;3:1-10.
11Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. Int Immunol 2007;19:813-824. 
12Wieder T, Eigentler T, Brenner E, Röcken M. Immune checkpoint blockade therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;142:1403-1414. 
13Vanpouille-Box C, Formenti SC, Demaria S. Toward Precision Radiotherapy for Use with Immune Checkpoint Blockers. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:259-265. 
14Zhang L, Sun L, Zhou Y, et al. Association of Survival and Immune-Related Adverse Events With Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Inhibitors, Alone or Their Combination for the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 13 Clinical Trials. Front Oncol 2021;11:575457. 
15Aide N, Hicks RJ, Le Tourneau C, Lheureux S, Fanti S, Lopci E. FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy : Report on the EANM symposium on immune modulation and recent review of the literature. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:238-250. 
16Liu M, Guo F. Recent updates on cancer immunotherapy. Precis Clin Med 2018;1:65-74.
17Castello A, Lopci E. The Role of PET/CT in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: State of Art. Curr Radiopharm 2020;13:24-31. 
18Decazes P, Bohn P. Immunotherapy by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Nuclear Medicine Imaging: Current and Future Applications. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:371.
19Chalian H, Töre HG, Horowitz JM, Salem R, Miller FH, Yaghmai V. Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST Versions 1.1 and 1.0. Radiographics 2011;31:2093-2105. 
20Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:1773-1782. 
21Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 2009;50:122-150.
22Pinker K, Riedl C, Weber WA. Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:55-66. 
23Costa LB, Queiroz MA, Barbosa FG, et al. Reassessing Patterns of Response to Immunotherapy with PET: From Morphology to Metabolism. Radiographics 2021;41:120-143.
24Fu Y, Maianu L, Melbert BR, Garvey WT. Facilitative glucose transporter gene expression in human lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages: a role for GLUT isoforms 1, 3, and 5 in the immune response and foam cell formation. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2004;32:182-190. 
25Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O’Day S, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:7412-7420.
26Wang GX, Kurra V, Gainor JF, et al. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Cancer Therapy: Spectrum of Imaging Findings. Radiographics 2017;37:2132-2144. 
27Sachpekidis C, Larribere L, Pan L, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hassel JC. Predictive value of early 18F-FDG PET/CT studies for treatment response evaluation to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: preliminary results of an ongoing study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:386-396. 
28Spigel DR, Chaft JE, Gettinger S, et al. FIR: Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Analysis of a Phase II Open-Label Study of Atezolizumab in PD-L1-Selected Patients With NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1733-1742. 
29Cho SY, Lipson EJ, Im HJ, et al. Prediction of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Using Early-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Advanced Melanoma. J Nucl Med 2017;58:1421-1428. 
30Goldfarb L, Duchemann B, Chouahnia K, Zelek L, Soussan M. Monitoring anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET: introduction of iPERCIST. EJNMMI Res 2019;9:8.
31Anwar H, Sachpekidis C, Winkler J, et al. Absolute number of new lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT is more predictive of clinical response than SUV changes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:376-383. 
32Sachpekidis C, Anwar H, Winkler J, et al. The role of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of response to ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:1289-1296.
33Ito K, Teng R, Schöder H, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Ipilimumab Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:335-341.
34Castello A, Rossi S, Toschi L, Lopci E. Comparison of Metabolic and Morphological Response Criteria for Early Prediction of Response and Survival in NSCLC Patients Treated With Anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Front Oncol 2020;10:1090. 
35Cheson BD, Ansell S, Schwartz L, et al. Refinement of the Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy. Blood 2016;128:2489-2496.
36Kwak JJ, Tirumani SH, Van den Abbeele AD, Koo PJ, Jacene HA. Cancer immunotherapy: imaging assessment of novel treatment response patterns and immune-related adverse events. Radiographics 2015;35:424-437.
37Tazdait M, Mezquita L, Lahmar J, et al. Patterns of responses in metastatic NSCLC during PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitor therapy: Comparison of RECIST 1.1, irRECIST and iRECIST criteria. Eur J Cancer 2018;88:38-47. 
38Humbert O, Cadour N, Paquet M, et al. 18FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020;47:1158-1167. 
39Humbert O, Chardin D. Dissociated Response in Metastatic Cancer: An Atypical Pattern Brought Into the Spotlight With Immunotherapy. Front Oncol 2020;10:566297.
40Mushti SL, Mulkey F, Tang S, et al. Immune Response Evaluation and Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Beyond Clinical Progression: Response Assessments for Cancer Immunotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2020;22:116. 
41Champiat S, Dercle L, Ammari S, et al. Hyperprogressive Disease Is a New Pattern of Progression in Cancer Patients Treated by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:1920-1928. 
42Kanjanapan Y, Day D, Wang L, et al. Hyperprogressive disease in early-phase immunotherapy trials: Clinical predictors and association with immune-related toxicities. Cancer 2019;125:1341-1349. 
43Champiat S, Ferrara R, Massard C, et al. Hyperprogressive disease: recognizing a novel pattern to improve patient management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15:748-762. 
44Schwenck J, Schörg B, Fiz F, et al. Cancer immunotherapy is accompanied by distinct metabolic patterns in primary and secondary lymphoid organs observed by non-invasive in vivo18F-FDG-PET. Theranostics 2020;10:925-937. 
45Sachpekidis C, Kopp-Schneider A, Hakim-Meibodi L, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hassel JC. 18F-FDG PET/CT longitudinal studies in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma for response evaluation of combination treatment with vemurafenib and ipilimumab. Melanoma Res 2019;29:178-186.
46Pinato DJ, Gramenitskaya D, Altmann DM, et al. Antibiotic therapy and outcome from immune-checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7:287. 
47Boursi B, Werner TJ, Gholami S, et al. Physiologic colonic fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake may predict response to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res 2019;29:318-321.
48Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12:252-264.
49Wolchok JD, Neyns B, Linette G, et al. Ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2, dose-ranging study. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:155-164.
50Fife BT, Bluestone JA. Control of peripheral T-cell tolerance and autoimmunity via the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways. Immunol Rev 2008;224:166-182. 
51Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, et al. Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1721-1728.
52Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med 2018;378:158-168.
53Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, et al. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019;16:563-580.
54Sosa A, Lopez Cadena E, Simon Olive C, Karachaliou N, Rosell R. Clinical assessment of immune-related adverse events. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2018;10:1758835918764628. 
55Friedman CF, Proverbs-Singh TA, Postow MA. Treatment of the Immune-Related Adverse Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:1346-1353.
56Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:143-152.
57Nobashi T, Baratto L, Reddy SA, et al. Predicting Response to Immunotherapy by Evaluating Tumors, Lymphoid Cell-Rich Organs, and Immune-Related Adverse Events Using FDG-PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2019;44:272-279. 
58Gilardi L, Colandrea M, Vassallo S, Travaini LL, Paganelli G. Ipilimumab-induced immunomediated adverse events: possible pitfalls in (18)F-FDG PET/CT interpretation. Clin Nucl Med 2014;39:472-474. 
59Sznol M, Postow MA, Davies MJ, et al. Endocrine-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade and expert insights on their management. Cancer Treat Rev 2017;58:70-76. 
60Chan KK, Bass AR. Autoimmune complications of immunotherapy: pathophysiology and management. BMJ 2020;369:m736. 
61Nishino M, Hatabu H, Sholl LM, Ramaiya NH. Thoracic Complications of Precision Cancer Therapies: A Practical Guide for Radiologists in the New Era of Cancer Care. Radiographics 2017;37:1371-1387. 
62Kottschade LA. Incidence and Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Curr Oncol Rep 2018;20:24.
63Cappelli LC, Gutierrez AK, Bingham CO 3rd, Shah AA. Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Immune-Related Adverse Events Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1751-1763. 
64Chorti E, Kanaki T, Zimmer L, et al. Drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction in adjuvant immunotherapy: Increased rate and mimicker of metastasis. Eur J Cancer 2020;131:18-26. 
65Tetzlaff MT, Nelson KC, Diab A, et al. Granulomatous/sarcoid-like lesions associated with checkpoint inhibitors: a marker of therapy response in a subset of melanoma patients. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6:14.
66Sachpekidis C, Larribère L, Kopp-Schneider A, Hassel JC, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Can benign lymphoid tissue changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT predict response to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma? Cancer Immunol Immunother 2019;68:297-303. 
67Valentinuzzi D, Vrankar M, Boc N, et al. [18F]FDG PET immunotherapy radiomics signature (iRADIOMICS) predicts response of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab. Radiol Oncol 2020;54:285-294. 
68Polverari G, Ceci F, Bertaglia V, et al. 18F-FDG Pet Parameters and Radiomics Features Analysis in Advanced Nsclc Treated with Immunotherapy as Predictors of Therapy Response and Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:1163. 
69Basler L, Gabryś HS, Hogan SA, et al. Radiomics, Tumor Volume, and Blood Biomarkers for Early Prediction of Pseudoprogression in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:4414-4425.
70Wei W, Rosenkrans ZT, Liu J, Huang G, Luo QY, Cai W. ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications. Chem Rev 2020;120:3787-3851.
71Filippi L, Nervi C, Proietti I, et al. Molecular imaging in immuno-oncology: current status and translational perspectives. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2020;20:1199-1211. 
72Alauddin MM, Khawli LA. Advances in Immuno-PET for the Detection of Cancer and Assessment of Response to Therapy. Curr Med Chem 2021;28:647-672. 
73Bensch F, van der Veen EL, Lub-de Hooge MN, et al. 89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat Med 2018;24:1852-1858. 
74Larimer BM, Wehrenberg-Klee E, Dubois F, et al. Granzyme B PET Imaging as a Predictive Biomarker of Immunotherapy Response. Cancer Res 2017;77:2318-2327. 
75Markovic SN, Galli F, Suman VJ, et al. Non-invasive visualization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a pilot study. Oncotarget 2018;9:30268-30278. 
76Yeh R, Trager MH, Rizk EM, et al. FLT-PET At 6 Weeks Predicts Response Assessed by CT at 12 Weeks in Melanoma Patients Treated With Pembrolizumab. Clin Nucl Med 2020;45:267-275. 
77Donnelly DJ, Smith RA, Morin P, et al. Synthesis and Biologic Evaluation of a Novel 18F-Labeled Adnectin as a PET Radioligand for Imaging PD-L1 Expression. J Nucl Med 2018;59:529-535. 
78Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Werner JM, Ceccon G, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Molecular imaging and advanced MRI findings following immunotherapy in patients with brain tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020;20:9-15. 
79Seith F, Forschner A, Schmidt H, et al. 18F-FDG-PET detects complete response to PD1-therapy in melanoma patients two weeks after therapy start. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:95-101. 
80Park C, Na KJ, Choi H, et al. Tumor immune profiles noninvasively estimated by FDG PET with deep learning correlate with immunotherapy response in lung adenocarcinoma. Theranostics 2020;10:10838-10848.
81Ren J, Xu M, Chen J, et al. PET imaging facilitates antibody screening for synergistic radioimmunotherapy with a 177Lu-labeled αPD-L1 antibody. Theranostics 2021;11:304-315. 
82Guzik P, Siwowska K, Fang HY, et al. Promising potential of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-folate to enhance tumor response to immunotherapy-a preclinical study using a syngeneic breast cancer model. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021;48:984-994. 
83Lasnon C, Enilorac B, Popotte H, Aide N. Impact of the EARL harmonization program on automatic delineation of metabolic active tumour volumes (MATVs). EJNMMI Res 2017;7:30. 
84Wei H, Jiang H, Song B. Role of medical imaging for immune checkpoint blockade therapy: From response assessment to prognosis prediction. Cancer Med 2019;8:5399-5413. 
85Kim BS, Kang J, Jun S, et al. Association between immunotherapy biomarkers and glucose metabolism from F-18 FDG PET. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020;24:8288-8295.
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House