What has PET/CT Changed in RT Applications?
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Review
P: 144-149
November 2023

What has PET/CT Changed in RT Applications?

Nucl Med Semin 2023;9(3):144-149
1. Medstar Antalya Hastanesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Kliniği, Antalya, Türkiye
2. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi, Tıbbi Görüntüleme Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye
3. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Publish Date: 28.12.2023
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Radiotherapy is a fundamental modality in today’s modern cancer treatment, with about half of all cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at some stage in their treatment. Determination of the optimal target volume and precise application of the dose prescribed to it constitute the basic principles of modern radiotherapy. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has made significant contributions not only to nuclear medicine but also in the field of radiation oncology. It has enhanced the accuracy and precision of target volume determination, thereby reducing the risk of normal tissue toxicity. Additionally, PET/CT enables the identification of areas within the tumor that exhibit metabolic heterogeneity, allowing for tailored treatment strategies. In this review, the contributions of PET/CT to the discipline of radiation oncology will be evaluated by dividing it into subheadings according to tumor types.

References

1
El-Galaly TC, Gormsen LC, Hutchings M. PET/CT for Staging; Past, Present, and Future. Semin Nucl Med 2018;481:4-16.
2
Pinker K, Riedl C, Weber WA. Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;441(Suppl 1):55-66.
3
Mankoff DA, Farwell MD, Clark AS, Pryma DA. Making Molecular Imaging a Clinical Tool for Precision Oncology: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2017;35:695-701.
4
Horsman MR, Mortensen LS, Petersen JB, Busk M, Overgaard J. Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;912:674-687.
5
Tamaki N, Hirata K. Tumor hypoxia: a new PET imaging biomarker in clinical oncology. Int J Clin Oncol 2016;214:619-625.
6
Thureau S, Dubray B, Modzelewski R, et al. FDG and FMISO PET-guided dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018;131:208.
7
Welz S, Paulsen F, Pfannenberg C, et al. Dose escalation to hypoxic subvolumes in head and neck cancer: A randomized phase II study using dynamic [18F]FMISO PET/CT. Radiother Oncol 2022;171:30-36.
8
Yue J, Chen L, Cabrera AR, et al. Measuring Tumor Cell Proliferation with 18F-FLT PET During Radiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Clinical Study. J Nucl Med 2010;514:528-534.
9
Lee IH, Piert M, Gomez-Hassan D, et al. Association of 11C-methionine PET uptake with site of failure after concurrent temozolomide and radiation for primary glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;732:479-485.
10
Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group; Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK, et al. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 1991;32424:1685-1690.
11
Rudmik L, Lau HY, Matthews TW, et al. Clinical utility of PET/CT in the evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with an unknown primary: a prospective clinical trial. Head Neck 2011;337:935-940.
12
Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, et al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose improves staging and patient management in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2010;287:1190-1195.
13
Xu G, Li J, Zuo X, Li C. Comparison of whole body positron emission tomography (PET)/PET-computed tomography and conventional anatomic imaging for detecting distant malignancies in patients with head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2012;1229:1974-1978.
14
Zhu L, Wang N. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography as a diagnostic tool in patients with cervical nodal metastases of unknown primary site: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2013;223:190-194.
15
Grégoire V, Thorwarth D, Lee JA. Molecular Imaging-Guided Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does it Fulfill the Promises?. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018;281:35-45.
16
Madani I, Duprez F, Boterberg T, et al. Maximum tolerated dose in a phase I trial on adaptive dose painting by numbers for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011;1013:351-355.
17
Rasmussen JH, Håkansson K, Vogelius IR, et al. Phase I trial of 18F-Fludeoxyglucose based radiation dose painting with concomitant cisplatin in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016;1201:76-80.
18
Troost EG, Bussink J, Hoffmann AL, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ, Kaanders JH. 18F-FLT PET/CT for Early Response Monitoring and Dose Escalation in Oropharyngeal Tumors. J Nucl Med 2010;516:866-874.
19
Duprez F, De Neve W, De Gersem W, Coghe M, Madani I. Adaptive dose painting by numbers for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;804:1045-1055.
20
Chang JY, Mehran RJ, Feng L, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (revised STARS): long-term results of a single-arm, prospective trial with prespecified comparison to surgery. Lancet Oncol 2021;2210:1448-1457.
21
Spigel DR, Faivre-Finn C, Gray JE, et al. Five-Year Survival Outcomes From the PACIFIC Trial: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022;4012:1301-1311.
22
Konert T, Vogel W, MacManus MP, et al. PET/CT imaging for target volume delineation in curative intent radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: IAEA consensus report 2014. Radiother Oncol 2015;1161:27-34.
23
Steinert HC, Hauser M, Allemann F, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: nodal staging with FDG PET versus CT with correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology 1997;2022:441-446.
24
Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28:iv1-iv21.
25
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Dieckmann K, et al. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on implementation and practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripherally located early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol2017;1241:11-17.
26
Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol 1995;131:8-10.
27
Gomez DR, Tang C, Zhang J, et al. Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study. J Clin Oncol 2019;3718:1558-1565.
28
Mac Manus MP, Hicks RJ, Matthews JP, et al. High rate of detection of unsuspected distant metastases by PET in apparent Stage III non–small-cell lung cancer: implications for radical radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;502:287-293.
29
van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, et al. Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002;3599315:1388-1393.
30
Kaplan HS. The radical radiotherapy of regionally localized Hodgkin's disease. Radiology 1962;78:553-561.
31
Girinsky T, van der Maazen R, Specht L, et al. Involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) in patients with early Hodgkin lymphoma: concepts and guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2006;793:270-277.
32
Wirth A, Mikhaeel NG, Aleman BMP, et al. Involved Site Radiation Therapy in Adult Lymphomas: An Overview of International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020;1075:909-933.
33
Girinsky T, Aupérin A, Ribrag V, et al. Role of FDG-PET in the implementation of involved-node radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;895:1047-1052.
34
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 2014;3227:3059-3068.
35
Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2014;3227:3048-3058.
36
André MP, Girinsky T, Federico M, et al. Early positron emission tomography response-adapted treatment in stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma: final results of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial. J Clin Oncol 2017;3516:1786-1794.
37
Borchmann P, Plütschow A, Kobe C, et al. PET-guided omission of radiotherapy in early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (GHSG HD17): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;222:223-234.
38
Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Kahraman D, et al. Assessment of tumor size reduction improves outcome prediction of positron emission tomography/computed tomography after chemotherapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2014;3217:1776-1781.
39
Freeman CL, Savage KJ, Villa DR, et al. Long-term results of PET-guided radiation in patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. Blood 2021;1377:929-938.
40
Pfreundschuh M, Christofyllakis K, Altmann B, et al. Radiotherapy to bulky disease PET-negative after immunochemotherapy in elderly DLBCL patients: Results of a planned interim analysis of the first 187 patients with bulky disease treated in the OPTIMAL> 60 study of the DSHNHL. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017.
41
Fuchs M, Goergen H, Kobe C, et al. Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Treatment in Early-Stage Favorable Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Results of the International, Randomized Phase III HD16 Trial by the German Hodgkin Study Group. J Clinical Oncol 2019;3731:2835-2845.
42
Atri M, Zhang Z, Dehdashti F, et al. Utility of PET-CT to evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer: Results of ACRIN6671/GOG0233 trial. Gynecol Oncol 2016;1423:413-419.
43
Pötter R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, et al. The EMBRACE II study: The outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018;9:48-60.
44
Kahvecioglu A, Gurlek E, Yedekci FY, Sari SY, Gultekin M, Yildiz F. Simultaneous integrated or sequential boost to clinically involved lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2023;176:10-15.
45
Han D, Yu J, Yu Y, et al. Comparison of 18F-Fluorothymidine and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in Delineating Gross Tumor Volume by Optimal Threshold in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Thoracic Esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;764:1235-1241.
46
Mahmud A, Poon R, Jonker D. PET imaging in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 2017;901080:20170370.
47
Zschaeck S, Lohaus F, Beck M, et al. PSMA-PET based radiotherapy: a review of initial experiences, survey on current practice and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2018;131:90.
48
Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021;711:1635-1642.
49
Thorwarth D. Functional imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning: current status and future directions-a review. Br J Radiol 2015;881051:20150056.
50
Jeraj R, Bradshaw T, Simončič U. Molecular Imaging to Plan Radiotherapy and Evaluate Its Efficacy. J Nucl Med 2015;5611:1752-1765.