The Role of Nuclear Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroblastoma
PDF

Review

The Role of Nuclear Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroblastoma

Nucl Med Semin 2025;11(3):158-170 DOI: 10.4274/nts.galenos.2025.08370
,
PDF
Permissions

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial malignancy in childhood. This embryonal tumor originates from the neural crest and is classified within the group of neuroendocrine tumors. It can arise anywhere along the sympathetic nervous system or in the adrenal medulla. At the time of diagnosis, nearly half of patients present with metastatic disease. Nuclear medicine imaging methods play a critical role in the diagnosis and follow-up of neuroblastoma. In addition to metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging, which is the current standard nuclear imaging modality, the development of novel positron emission tomography-compatible radiopharmaceuticals in recent years has opened new horizons for the molecular-level assessment of the disease. Patients with neuroblastoma are stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with treatment strategies differing substantially among these categories. Various therapeutic approaches are selected according to risk classification and patient-specific characteristics. Through theranostic strategies targeting biological markers expressed by neuroblastoma cells, several radionuclide therapies have been developed, most notably MIBG therapy, which has long been established as a cornerstone in this field. This review focuses on nuclear medicine applications in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroblastoma.

Keywords: Molecular, metaiodobenzylguanidine, DOTA, DOPA, radionuclide

References

1

Chung C, Boterberg T, Lucas J, et al. Neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68(Suppl 2):e28473.

2

Morgenstern DA, London WB, Stephens D, et al. Prognostic significance of pattern and burden of metastatic disease in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a study from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group database. Eur J Cancer. 2016;65:1-10.

3

Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:1466-7147.

4

Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:298-303.

5

Brisse HJ, McCarville MB, Granata C, et al. Guidelines for imaging and staging of neuroblastic tumors: consensus report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project. Radiology. 2011;261:243-257.

6

Bar-Sever Z, Biassoni L, Shulkin B, et al. Guidelines on nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2009-2024.

7

Irwin MS, Naranjo A, Zhang FF, et al. Revised Neuroblastoma Risk Classification System: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:3229-3241.

8

Whittle SB, Smith V, Doherty E, Zhao S, McCarty S, Zage PE. Overview and recent advances in the treatment of neuroblastoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17:369-386.

9

Wieland DM, Wu J, Brown LE, Mangner TJ, Swanson DP, Beierwaltes WH. Radiolabeled adrenergi neuron-blocking agents: adrenomedullary imaging with [131I]iodobenzylguanidine. J Nucl Med. 1980;21:349-353.

10

Sisson JC, Frager MS, Valk TW, et al. Scintigraphic localization of pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:12-17.

11

Samim A, Tytgat GAM, Bleeker G, et al. Nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma: current status and new developments. J Pers Med. 2021;11:270.

12

Pfluger T, Piccardo A. Neuroblastoma: MIBG imaging and new tracers. Semin Nucl Med. 2017;47:143-157.

13

Feng L, Li S, Wang C, Yang J. Current status and future perspective on molecular imaging and treatment of neuroblastoma. Semin Nucl Med. 2023;53:517-529.

14

Ady N, Zucker JM, Asselain B, et al. A new 123I-MIBG whole body scan scoring method--application to the prediction of the response of metastases to induction chemotherapy in stage IV neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:256-261.

15

Matthay KK, Edeline V, Lumbroso J, et al. Correlation of early metastatic response by 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy with overall response and event-free survival in stage IV neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2486-2491.

16

Lewington V, Lambert B, Poetschger U, et al. (123)I-mIBG scintigraphy in neuroblastoma: development of a SIOPEN semi-quantitative reporting ,method by an international panel. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:234-241.

17

Decarolis B, Schneider C, Hero B, et al. Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy scoring allows prediction of outcome in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: results of the Cologne interscore comparison study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:944-951.

18

Zhang H, Huang R, Cheung NK, et al. Imaging the norepinephrine transporter in neuroblastoma: a comparison of [18F]-MFBG and 123I-MIBG. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2182-2191.

19

Pauwels E, Celen S, Vandamme M, et al. Improved resolution and sensitivity of [(18)F]MFBG PET compared with [(123)I]MIBG SPECT in a patient with a norepinephrine transporter-expressing tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:313-315.

20

Pandit-Taskar N, Zanzonico P, Staton KD, et al. Biodistribution and dosimetry of (18)F-meta-fluorobenzylguanidine: a first-in-human PET/CT imaging study of patients with neuroendocrine malignancies. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:147-153.

21

Sharp SE, Shulkin BL, Gelfand MJ, Salisbury S, Furman WL. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET in neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1237-1243.

22

Melzer HI, Coppenrath E, Schmid I, et al. (1)(2)(3)I-MIBG scintigraphy/SPECT versus (1)(8)F-FDG PET in paediatric neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1648-1658.

23

Papathanasiou ND, Gaze MN, Sullivan K, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging in high-risk neuroblastoma: diagnostic comparison and survival analysis. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:519-525.

24

Gil TY, Lee DK, Lee JM, Yoo ES, Ryu KH. Clinical experience with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanine scintigraphy in pediatric neuroblastoma: complementary roles in follow-up of patients. Korean J Pediatr. 2014;57:278-286.

25

Kushner BH, Yeung HW, Larson SM, Kramer K, Cheung NK. Extending positron emission tomography scan utility to high-risk neuroblastoma: fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as sole imaging modality in follow-up of patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3397-3405.

26

Taggart DR, Han MM, Quach A, et al. Comparison of iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate response after iodine-131 MIBG therapy for relapsed neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5343-5349.

27

Liu CJ, Lu MY, Liu YL, et al. Risk Stratification of Pediatric Patients With Neuroblastoma Using Volumetric Parameters of 18F-FDG and 18F-DOPA PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e142-e148.

28

Kang SY, Rahim MK, Kim YI, et al. Clinical Significance of Pretreatment FDG PET/CT in MIBG-Avid Pediatric Neuroblastoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;51:154-160.

29

Li C, Zhang J, Chen S, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic indices and bone marrow uptake pattern on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:306-315.

30

Lee JW, Cho A, Yun M, Lee JD, Lyu CJ, Kang WJ. Prognostic value of pretreatment FDG PET in pediatric neuroblastoma. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2633-2639.

31

Wang G, Si Y, Liu J, Wang W, Yang J. Prognostic value of metabolic parameters and textural features in pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT of primary lesions for pediatric patients with neuroblastoma. Acad Radiol. 2024;31:1091-101.

32

Tolboom N, Servaes SE, Zhuang H. Neuroblastoma presenting as non-MIBG-avid widespread soft tissue metastases without bone involvement revealed by FDG PET/CT Imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:643-644.

33

Wartski M, Jehanno N, Michon J, de Labriolle-Vaylet C, Montravers F. Weak uptake of 123I-MIBG and 18F-FDOPA contrasting with high 18F-FDG uptake in stage I neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:969-970.

34

Codreanu I, Zhuang H. Disparities in uptake pattern of (123)I-MIBG, (18)F-FDG, and (99m)Tc-MDP within the same primary neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:e184-6.

35

Colavolpe C, Guedj E, Cammilleri S, Taieb D, Mundler O, Coze C. Utility of FDG-PET/CT in the follow-up of neuroblastoma which became MIBG-negative. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;51:828-831.

36

Sato Y, Kurosawa H, Sakamoto S, et al. Usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for follow-up of 13-cis-retinoic acid treatment for residual neuroblastoma after myeloablative chemotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1290.

37

Garcia JR, Bassa P, Soler M, Jaramillo A, Ortiz S, Riera E. Benign differentiation of treated neuroblastoma as a cause of false positive by (123)I-MIBG SPECT/CT. Usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed). 2019;38:389-390.

38

Shammas A, Lim R, Charron M. Pediatric FDG PET/CT: physiologic uptake, normal variants, and benign conditions. Radiographics. 2009;29:1467-1486.

39

Lopci E, D'Ambrosio D, Nanni C, et al. Feasibility of carbidopa premedication in pediatric patients: a pilot study. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2012;27:729-733.

40

Piccardo A, Lopci E, Conte M, et al. Comparison of 18F-dopa PET/CT and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in stage 3 and 4 neuroblastoma: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:57-71.

41

Lu MY, Liu YL, Chang HH, et al. Characterization of neuroblastic tumors using 18F-FDOPA PET. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:42-49.

42

Piccardo A, Morana G, Puntoni M, et al. Diagnosis, treatment response, and prognosis: the role of (18)F-DOPA PET/CT in children affected by neuroblastoma in comparison with (123)I-mIBG scan: the first prospective study. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:367-374.

43

Lopci E, Piccardo A, Nanni C, et al. 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:e73-e78.

44

Piccardo A, Puntoni M, Lopci E, et al. Prognostic value of (1)(8)F-DOPA PET/CT at the time of recurrence in patients affected by neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1046-1056.

45

Georgantzi K, Tsolakis AV, Stridsberg M, Jakobson A, Christofferson R, Janson ET. Differentiated expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in experimental models and clinical neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56:584-589.

46

Hofman MS, Lau WF, Hicks RJ. Somatostatin receptor imaging with 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT: clinical utility, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls in interpretation. Radiographics. 2015;35:500-516.

47

Kroiss A, Putzer D, Uprimny C, et al. Functional imaging in phaeochromocytoma and neuroblastoma with 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr 3-octreotide positron emission tomography and 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:865-873.

48

Kong G, Hofman MS, Murray WK, et al. Initial experience with gallium-68 DOTA-octreotate PET/CT and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for pediatric patients with refractory metastatic neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016;38:87-96.

49

Gains JE, Aldridge MD, Mattoli MV, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE and 123I-mIBG as imaging biomarkers of disease localisation in metastatic neuroblastoma: implications for molecular radiotherapy. Nucl Med Commun. 2020;41:1169-1177.

50

Torun N. 68Ga-DOTA-TATE in neuroblastoma with marrow involvement. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44:467-468.

51

Telli T, Lay Ergun E, Volkan Salanci B, Ozgen Kiratli P. The complementary role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45:326-329.

52

Alexander N, Marrano P, Thorner P, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlations of somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2) expression in neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2019;41:222-227.

53

Chen X, Kudo T, Lapa C, Buck A, Higuchi T. Recent advances in radiotracers targeting norepinephrine transporter: structural development and radiolabeling improvements. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020;127:851-873.

54

Schmitt J, Schwenck J, Maurer A, et al. Translational immunoPET imaging using a radiolabeled GD2-specific antibody in neuroblastoma. Theranostics. 2022;12:5615-5630.

55

Trautwein NF, Schwenck J, Seitz C, et al. A novel approach to guide GD2-targeted therapy in pediatric tumors by PET and [(64)Cu]Cu-NOTA-ch14.18/CHO. Theranostics. 2024;14:1212-1223.

56

Wafelman AR, Nortier YL, Rosing H, et al. Renal excretion of meta-iodobenzylguanidine after therapeutic doses in cancer patients and its relation to dose and creatinine clearance. Nucl Med Commun. 1995;16:767-772.

57

Treuner J, Klingebiel T, Feine U, et al. Clinical experiences in the treatment of neuroblastoma with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1986;3:205-216.

58

Wilson JS, Gains JE, Moroz V, Wheatley K, Gaze MN. A systematic review of 131I-meta iodobenzylguanidine molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:801-815.

59

Parisi MT, Eslamy H, Park JR, Shulkin BL, Yanik GA. (1)(3)(1)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine theranostics in neuroblastoma: historical perspectives; practical applications. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46:184-202.

60

Matthay KK, DeSantes K, Hasegawa B, et al. Phase I dose escalation of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with autologous bone marrow support in refractory neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:229-236.

61

Matthay KK, Yanik G, Messina J, et al. Phase II study on the effect of disease sites, age, and prior therapy on response to iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy in refractory neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1054-1060.

62

Yanik GA, Villablanca JG, Maris JM, et al. 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma. A new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy (NANT) phase II study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:673-681.

63

Yanik GA, Levine JE, Matthay KK, et al. Pilot study of iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine in combination with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell support for the treatment of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2142-2149.

64

Flaadt T, Ebinger M, Schreiber M, et al. Multimodal therapy with consolidating haploidentical stem cell transplantation and dinutuximab beta for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma and central nervous system relapse. J Clin Med. 2023;12:6196.

65

Howard JP, Maris JM, Kersun LS, et al. Tumor response and toxicity with multiple infusions of high dose 131I-MIBG for refractory neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;44:232-239.

66

Johnson K, McGlynn B, Saggio J, et al. Safety and efficacy of tandem 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine infusions in relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57:1124-1129.

67

Samim A, Bleeker G, Kraal KC, van Noesel MM, de Keizer B, Tytgat GA. A narrative review of 35 years of meta-[131I] iodobenzylguanidine therapy in neuroblastoma. EJC Paediatric Oncology. 2024;3:100159.

68

DuBois SG, Granger MM, Groshen S, et al. Randomized phase II trial of MIBG versus MIBG, vincristine, and irinotecan versus MIBG and vorinostat for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a report from NANT consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:3506-3514.

69

de Kraker J, Hoefnagel KA, Verschuur AC, van Eck B, van Santen HM, Caron HN. Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine as initial induction therapy in stage 4 neuroblastoma patients over 1 year of age. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:551-556.

70

Mastrangelo S, Rufini V, Ruggiero A, Di Giannatale A, Riccardi R. Treatment of advanced neuroblastoma in children over 1 year of age: the critical role of (1)(3)(1)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine combined with chemotherapy in a rapid induction regimen. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56:1032-1040.

71

Weiss BD, Yanik G, Naranjo A, et al. A safety and feasibility trial of (131) I-MIBG in newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68:e29117.

72

Lee JW, Lee S, Cho HW, et al. Incorporation of high-dose (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment into tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma: results of the SMC NB-2009 study. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:108.

73

DuBois SG, Chesler L, Groshen S, et al. Phase I study of vincristine, irinotecan, and (1)(3)(1)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2679-2686.

74

DuBois SG, Messina J, Maris JM, et al. Hematologic toxicity of high-dose iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for advanced neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2452-2460.

75

Cougnenc O, Defachelles AS, Carpentier P, et al. High-dose 131i-Mibg therapies in children: feasibility, patient dosimetry and radiation exposure to workers and family caregivers. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;173:395-404.

76

Flux G, Leek F, Gape P, Gear J, Taprogge J. Iodine-131 and iodine-131-meta-iodobenzylguanidine dosimetry in cancer therapy. Semin Nucl Med. 2022;52:167-177.

77

Trieu M, DuBois SG, Pon E, et al. Impact of whole-body radiation dose on response and toxicity in patients with neuroblastoma after therapy with 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:436-442.

78

Buckley SE, Saran FH, Gaze MN, et al. Dosimetry for fractionated (131)I-mIBG therapies in patients with primary resistant high-risk neuroblastoma: preliminary results. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2007;22:105-112.

79

van Santen HM, de Kraker J, van Eck BL, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. High incidence of thyroid dysfunction despite prophylaxis with potassium iodide during (131)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine treatment in children with neuroblastoma. Cancer. 2002;94:2081-2089.

80

Clement SC, van Eck-Smit BL, van Trotsenburg AS, Kremer LC, Tytgat GA, van Santen HM. Long-term follow-up of the thyroid gland after treatment with 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine in children with neuroblastoma: importance of continuous surveillance. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:1833-1838.

81

Giardino S, Piccardo A, Conte M, et al. (131) I-Meta-iodobenzylguanidine followed by busulfan and melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue in high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68:e28775.

82

Clement SC, Kraal KC, van Eck-Smit BL, et al. Primary ovarian insufficiency in children after treatment with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for neuroblastoma: report of the first two cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E112-E116.

83

Gains JE, Bomanji JB, Fersht NL, et al. 177Lu-DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy for childhood neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1041-1047.

84

Gains JE, Moroz V, Aldridge MD, et al. A phase IIa trial of molecular radiotherapy with 177-lutetium DOTATATE in children with primary refractory or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2348-2357.

85

Fathpour G, Jafari E, Hashemi A, et al. Feasibility and therapeutic potential of combined peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with intensive chemotherapy for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic neuroblastoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46:540-548.

86

Gawne PJ, Bryant HE, DuBois SG, et al. Theranostics for neuroblastoma: making molecular radiotherapy work better. J Nucl Med. 2025;66:490-496.

87

Slatnick LR, Jimeno A, Gore L, Macy ME. Naxitamab: a humanized anti-glycolipid disialoganglioside (anti-GD2) monoclonal antibody for treatment of neuroblastoma. Drugs Today (Barc). 2021;57:677-688.

88

Kramer K, Kushner BH, Modak S, et al. Compartmental intrathecal radioimmunotherapy: results for treatment for metastatic CNS neuroblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2010;97:409-418.

89

Cheung NK, Kushner BH, LaQuaglia M, et al. N7: a novel multi-modality therapy of high risk neuroblastoma (NB) in children diagnosed over 1 year of age. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001;36:227-230.

90

Cheung NK, Cheung IY, Kushner BH, et al. Murine anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody 3F8 combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and 13-cis-retinoic acid in high-risk patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma in first remission. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3264-3270.

91

Batra V, Samanta M, Makvandi M, et al. Preclinical development of [211At]meta- astatobenzylguanidine ([211At]MABG) as an alpha particle radiopharmaceutical therapy for neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:4146-4157.

92

Bolcaen J, Gizawy MA, Terry SYA, et al. Marshalling the potential of auger electron radiopharmaceutical therapy. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1344-1351.